All right, welcome to the Harmony channel, I am Jason Whitlock, your host. Thank you so much for joining me. I believe today's

discussion on Harmony will be the best discussion we've done here on Harmony. If I can pull it off,

and I think I can. Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes had a two-hour and 20-minute discussion yesterday.

I'm not sure when the discussion happened, but it aired yesterday. And I found the discussion

fascinating, informative, and incomplete, fascinating, fascinating, informative, and incomplete.

Fascinating, informative, and incomplete.

So Tucker clearly had an agenda, and he talked about it, or he talked about his agenda a little bit but i don't

think he was crystal clear and and just or as transparent as he perhaps could have been or but

just my takeaway is the first 40 minutes of the interview was the reason for

the interview and then the rest was things that Tucker was interested in and Tucker at the end the last 30 minutes I felt tried to mentor,

disciple, push, probe Nick Fuentes about his personal life and he did it in a very non-threatening

way and I found that fascinating.

And so there was about 45 minutes at the start of the interview and 30 minutes at the

end of the interview that I found most interesting.

And then there were parts of it that, you know, they're having the conversation and there's better things that I

would have talked about. And that's why I call the interview incomplete, because there were things

not addressed in the interview. You know, there was an opportunity to address Nick's engagement

with Candace. Why am I? Candice. What is Candice's last name?

Owens. Oh, I what a brain for it. Candice Owens. I was about to say Candice Parker. I'm thinking about

basketball. But there was no mention of the Candice Owens dust up between Nick and Candice.

And I found that like, that's interesting.

Why didn't they go there?

...