This is CBS. I am the world, the New World Report with Professor Evan Alice of the

U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute. I'm John Bachelor.

I go to the Reuters headline from Mexico City.

Mexican Lower House passes controversial judicial reform in marathon session.

Professor, a very good day to you.

This connects directly to this story we were just looking at from as many sides as possible with or without Starlink.

And I note ironically, the professor and I are talking on Starlink right now. I'm its customers. Living in the countryside, it is a joy to have

a way to connect that doesn't depend upon power lines and the vicissitudes of electricity in America.

However, in Mexico, they're looking at judicial reform that might be more ambitious than the Supreme Court Justice de Marises in Brazil.

What we have here, Professor, is part of a chain of decisions to be made by Amlo, by the Mexican legislature, by the courts, and by the new

president, Claudia Shinebaum.

In a marathon session, Mexico's lower house approved a controversial judicial reform, a crucial step

towards cementing a key ambition of outgoing President Amlow and setting the tone for the next administration.

What is the legislation?

Why is it controversial?

Remine, Professor.

First of all, the broader context, as you alluded to, globalization and inflows and

investment in countries and across countries depends on a predictable legal framework.

Globalization has the premise that the judicial organizations can be objective in

or not politicized.

When you begin to see the use of judicial organs

in the service of the executive,

...