coming up on this episode of the roundtable. You have a bunch of kids who are probably pretty bright.

They've been told their whole lives, you know, they're the best and the brightest. They have

very, very radical sort of liberal politics. They go to some of the best schools, Bowdoin is,

you know, one of very highly ranked schools. They graduate with an enormous amount of debt because

their parents are not the ultra rich who can pay the sticker price of 85k a year upfront. All of their peers in those schools that actually focus,

instead of focusing on radical politics, actually got, I don't know, computer science degrees or

finance degrees, right? They go in, work in Wall Street, and there's a split after college, right?

In college, the U.S. taxpayer subsidizes the same lifestyle that they had with their upper

middle class parents, more or less.

They can continue that into young adulthood.

After they graduate, and that money dries up, if they go into, for example, nonprofits

or they go into radical activism or whatever, they're making decent money compared to the

rest of the country. You know, they're making decent money compared to the rest

of the country. They're making usually 80 or 100 or $120,000 a year, but there's a huge split

between what the people on Wall Street or in the top law firms are making in New York and this

category of activist. I think that ticks them off.

They think that they deserve the lifestyle of the ultra-rich

and the people who did the bad things of going into these corporations and making a ton of money.

I don't think they have a conservative attitude towards the trade-offs of that. I think there

is an enormous amount of resentment. I think they come out with heavy debt and thinking

that they are the best and brightest and that the country owes them a really good lifestyle,

a track to power. I think Mondami is that.

...