From the New York Times, I'm Michael Barrow.

This is the Daily One.

Today, the Mueller team sent its report to the Attorney General, William Barrett.

The Attorney General sent a summary of that report to Congress.

Now, new reporting shows members of Mueller's team feel that Barrett's summary did not

reflect the report they wrote.

It's Thursday, April 4.

So take us back to the beginning of last week.

What do we know at that point?

So we knew that Bill Barr, taking Bob Mueller's three to 400-page report, had gone through

it extensively and boiled down what he called the principal conclusions to just four pages.

Dick Fando's covers Congress.

Mike Schmidt covers National Security.

We were in this unusual situation where the special counsel, Robert Mueller, had sent his

report to the Attorney General, said, I found no evidence that the campaign conspired with

Russia to impact the election, but he declined to make a decision on obstruction.

And what he said was, Mueller didn't reach what Barr called a traditional prosecutorial

decision.

In other words, Mueller presented evidence for the fact that the president may have obstructed

justice, but didn't go as far as to conclude that he had.

He essentially punted to the Attorney General's office.

And in this case, by Mueller not reaching a determination, he leaves the door open for

...