meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Psychology In Seattle Podcast

Narcissistic Emails #1

Psychology In Seattle Podcast

Kirk Honda

Mental Health, Health & Fitness

4.61.2K Ratings

🗓️ 3 September 2021

⏱️ 66 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Dr. Kirk answers emails.

Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle
Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact
Get merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle
Dr. Kirk’s Cameo: https://www.cameo.com/kirkhonda
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/
Discord: https://discord.gg/6QR4sE8x9K
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/PsychologyInSeattle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PsychInSeattle
Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/
Facebook Fan Page (run by fans): https://www.facebook.com/groups/112633189213033

The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®

Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.

Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/3269717/advertisement

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hey, deserve listeners. I got a lot of emails about narcissism. So I thought I would

0:04.5

answer your questions. I also just now put out a call on discord in the Facebook fan page asking

0:11.6

people to submit their questions on narcissism. So let's get into it. Listen to Laura from Alabama

0:18.0

wrote in a while ago and said, can someone who identifies as an empath become a narcissist?

0:24.9

I have been friends with my closest friend for 15 years. The older we get, the more

0:29.4

self-absorbed she becomes, the more and the more unwilling she is to admit fault or wrongdoing.

0:35.5

Yet she is an empath. Can she also be a narcissist? End of email. Well first, let's try to define what

0:43.9

an empath is. This is a non-clinical construct, meaning that it is not discussed in the literature

0:50.9

at all as far as I can tell. Only something that is discussed online. And just because it's

0:56.5

discussed on a website called psychology today or something does not mean that it's a legit

1:01.8

psychological construct. Now that doesn't mean that it's not a useful construct because there

1:06.5

are non-clinical constructs that can be useful. But usually what happens in psychology is that

1:13.4

if in the common culture there is a term that's being used eventually clinicians will start

1:21.1

doing research on it. They'll start writing dissertations about it and it'll become a clinical

1:27.1

construct. And the the empath construct has been around for decades and has yet to become in my

1:34.0

circle a a legit clinical construct. Now that isn't it's fine people use it. But when something

1:42.8

becomes a legit psychological concept, it's researched, it's defined, it's established as something

1:50.6

that is that exists in science. So we don't have any confirmation of that and it's really

1:57.9

born out in the criteria. I just looked at the you know top 10 hits when you look at you know

2:04.3

MI and empath on Google and I made a list of these criteria. These are the criteria compilation,

2:12.9

compiled from various different definitions of what it is to be an empath. You absorb you absorb

2:20.0

others emotions. So that's a pretty common criterion. You feel big feelings often. You feel vibes

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Kirk Honda, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Kirk Honda and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.