meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Divided Argument

My Despised World

Divided Argument

Will Baude & Dan Epps

Constitution, Constitutional Law, News, Law, Politics, Supreme Court, Government, Legal System, Supreme Court Of The United States, U.s. Supreme Court, Scotus, Supreme Court Justice

4.9676 Ratings

🗓️ 21 July 2023

⏱️ 115 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

After some inevitable self-flagellation for our lengthy hiatus, we catch up on some recent news and debate SCOTUS ethics. We then talk about implications of the Harvard/UNC affirmative action case, revisit Mallory v. Norfolk Southern, and break down the latest case captioned "United States v. Texas."

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yay, oh, yeah.

0:03.4

The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court.

0:08.1

Unless there is any more question, we have to find an argument in this case.

0:11.1

All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are

0:16.1

in honor us to give their attention.

0:19.5

Welcome to Divided Argument, an unscheduled, unbidable Supreme Court podcast.

0:24.6

I'm Will Bode.

0:26.0

And I am Dan Epps back from a poorly timed vacation, I would say.

0:33.3

I think they're very well-timed.

0:34.6

I think this season we've really come into our own, just skipping out on most of June.

0:39.6

You know, I think it does continue sort of the thing you said last time, which was the original plan for the podcast was like a June-only podcast.

0:48.8

So now it's a not June podcast.

0:51.1

It's an every other month podcast.

0:52.7

I mean, look, as the discourse has changed,

0:54.7

there's a time when I thought what the discourse most needs was, you know,

0:58.3

sophisticated analysis of Supreme Court opinions as close as time to when they come out.

1:03.1

And now I do think someone with the discourse needs is the opposite of that. It needs, you know,

1:07.3

people to rise above. That's the best defense for the choices we made here.

1:11.5

But the good news is, as the Supreme Court is in kind of a low, fallow period and maybe,

1:18.9

you know, some other commentators, make conification, I don't know.

1:22.5

And we can try to clear the backlog a little bit with a little bit of time to reflect, maybe say

1:30.2

stuff that's different than is out there in the discourse. I don't really follow the discourse.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Will Baude & Dan Epps, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Will Baude & Dan Epps and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.