meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Mona Charen Show

Must Geniuses Be Ass-----?

The Mona Charen Show

The Bulwark

News, Politics, News Commentary

4.6 • 1.3K Ratings

🗓️ 14 July 2025

⏱️ 69 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Atlantic’s Helen Lewis joins Mona Charen to discuss The Genius Myth, her new book exploring whether genius is a real phenomenon or a socially constructed label. They examine how society elevates certain individuals—often more for charisma or timing than raw talent—and how the genius myth can excuse bad behavior while undervaluing empathy, humility, and collaboration. The conversation also touches on the “genius wives,” prodigies, the costs of fame, and Lewis's recent piece on the Skrmetti decision.

For a limited time, you can try OneSkin with 15% off using code MONACHAREN at oneskin.co. 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the moment of challenge.

0:05.8

I'm so glad you could join us.

0:08.0

Thrilled to welcome back, Helen Lewis, staff writer at The Atlantic, who is also the author of a new book, The Genius Myth, a curious history of a dangerous idea. Helen Lewis, thank you so much for

0:24.5

joining me. What possessed you to write this book? Yeah, it's a really good question and one

0:31.0

that I've asked myself several times in the last couple of weeks since it's come out,

0:34.6

because it's such a giant topic, isn't it? You know, lots of people

0:37.8

have been writing about genius for centuries now. But I just really like the idea that this was a word

0:43.1

that lots and lots of people were using, but maybe none of us really had any idea by what we meant by it.

0:47.5

I think that's just kind of inherently interesting when you have words that are so heavily

0:51.3

debated. And underneath that is a concept, again, that people can't agree on. You know, you have words that are so heavily debated. And underneath that is a concept, again, that people

0:54.5

can't agree on. You know, you have, you know, people in the 18th century really have big

1:00.5

struggles with trying to kind of define stuff. They're, for example, very interested in originality,

1:05.5

which I think we now completely think that genius is about originality. But that's, you know,

1:09.9

that's not its original meaning at all. So it also allowed me to get into some of the stuff that I'm about originality. But that's, you know, that's not its original meaning at all.

1:11.6

So it also allowed me to get into some of the stuff that I'm really fascinated about,

1:15.2

about celebrity and the history of intelligence testing and, you know, all of this kind of

1:21.0

stuff is also really fascinating to me. Yeah. So what was the original meaning of the term genius? Well, so the ancient Greeks and Romans,

1:31.3

you know, you had a genius. You know, it was a guiding spirit. You weren't a genius. You

1:35.8

had one. And I think that sort of changed. It's hard to pinpoint exactly, but by the time of Samuel

1:41.4

Johnson's dictionary, which is 1600s, then it has become

1:45.9

the definition of a genius is a man of superior faculties. You know, that you can at that point

1:50.8

describe someone as being a genius. And at the same time, you know, you've just come out of the

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Bulwark, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Bulwark and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.