Mootness and Munsingwear

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.7 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 25 January 2021

⏱️ 85 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Supreme Court “munsingweared” several cases in its Monday orders, including two Trump emoluments cases. After a deep dive into the legal history of munsingwear precedent—a modern mootness doctrine—David and Sarah discuss a Texas deportation case filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, pretrial release conditions for those who were arrested during the January 6 Capitol siege, and a Supreme Court original jurisdiction case. A special guest also joins the show to chat about Wendy’s chicken sandwiches! Show Notes: -United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. and Trump v. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. -“The Great Chicken Sandwich (Meal) Wars, Settled” by Sarah Isgur in The Dispatch. -Take our podcast survey Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	You ready?
0:02.0	I was born ready.
0:04.0	Welcome to the advisory opinions podcast.
0:24.0	We've got a unique pod today, a unique pod.
0:29.0	We're going to talk about monthsing wear, monthsing wear, which some people might know of
0:34.6	as underwear, but it has another meaning.
0:38.1	So we're going to talk about monthsing wear.
0:40.1	We're going to talk about a Texas deportation case filed by the attorney general of Texas
0:45.3	Ken Paxton.
0:47.0	It's the first of the what will undoubtedly be a tsunami of lawsuits filed against Biden
0:53.2	administration executive actions.
0:56.4	This one's filed in Texas.
0:58.2	It's the first one.
1:00.0	It's got an interesting twist to it.
1:03.3	We're going to talk a little bit about pretrial release conditions on those people who stormed
1:08.5	the Capitol.
1:10.0	And we're also going to talk about a Supreme Court original jurisdiction case.
1:15.9	And if that isn't enough and already you're on the edge of your seats, if that isn't
1:22.3	enough, we're going to talk to the person who was Sarah what?
1:26.0	The number, former number two marketer and no, not marketer number two, something in
1:33.0	all of Wendy's.
1:34.2	Yeah, I'm very excited about this.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.