The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are simply that.

Opinions.

All are presumed innocent until proven otherwise in a court of law.

Sensitive topics are discussed.

Discretion is advised.

We're on the record in week five of the Karen Reid murder retrial.

I'm Cody Thomas, and this week the Karen Reed retrial takes a sharp

turn. A forensic expert admits he lied about his qualifications. A critical piece of vehicle

data was missed entirely and a neurosurgeon suggests John O'Keefe's fatal injury might not

have come from a car at all. The prosecution is still building its case,

but the cracks are starting to show. The death of John O'Keefe was tragic, a brave officer

raising two children as a single parent. Now his girlfriend Karen Reid has been, has been charged with his murder, and the case has been

clouded by controversy surrounding surveillance videos from the night John died and the investigation

which followed.

Some videos don't exist.

Some have gaps in time, and others are just not 100% clear.

In a case where each side has a completely different version of how John O'Keefe died, evidence from videos should help the jury find the truth.

During the first trial, the jury was divided and could not agree about what happened.

But now, second time around, both sides are hoping their side's interpretation of these videos will

persuade the jury. Meanwhile, the public waits as the evidence unfolds inside the courtroom.

Today's testimony zeroed in on digital forensics and DNA analysis.

Digital forensic analyst Shannon Burgess dropped a bombshell,

...