Creative Babel.

Yeah, Javier, just kind of tell me what you know about the Miranda rights.

Well, Miranda rights. I mean, everybody knows that if you get arrested, the officer has to

read you your rights. If you, they don't read you your rights and maybe, you know, the evidence

or your confession or whatever gets thrown out in court, that's, that's really all I know about it.

I don't even know how this got started. And I have studied this case before, but I somehow

had forgotten that all of this is based on a case out of Arizona. Would you be surprised and

learn that this case was actually a rape case that it's based on? I had no idea. So this was a

rape case. And yeah, I mean, so the idea one is that Miranda versus Arizona was the Supreme Court

case. And Miranda was the perpetrator, the actual rape case or Nesto Miranda. And so it was a case

where, you know, he had a confession. And it was eventually thrown out by the Supreme Court

because he was not advised of his rights. Wow. So this, this man accused of rape Miranda,

the case went away just because they didn't read him his rights. I mean, that's like the whole

conception of this idea of Miranda rights. Right. I mean, it went back to a second trial because

they threw out his confession. So the state had to retry him. And this idea that all the focus,

I mean, the names, the landmark aspects of this case are tied to the name Miranda. Yeah.

Who is the, who was the perpetrator? The person who is completely left out of the entire story

here is the victim. Yeah. And what do we know about this victim? Yeah. So we, I mean, this case

happened in the early 1960s. And I mean, a totally different era. And it was a young girl. She was

I think still in high school. And she had been abducted by this man and raped. And so she had to

come forward and agree to testify. And there were a lot of people telling her not to do it and that

she didn't have anything to gain by doing it. So this movie that we're going to be talking about

...