May Rolls the Dice
TALKING POLITICS
Catherine Carr
4.7 • 2.5K Ratings
🗓️ 4 April 2019
⏱️ 48 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
David and Helen talk through the latest twist in the Brexit tale: Theresa May's offer to work with Labour to get some version of Brexit over the line. Can the two parties ever agree on what that version is? Could any agreement be made to stick? And if they can't agree, what happens next? Plus we talk about whether May's offer to stand down is still in effect and we ask what all this might mean for the ERG, the DUP, the SNP and the EU.
Talking Points:
On Tuesday night, Theresa May changed strategies: instead of courting Brexiteers and the DUP to get her withdrawal agreement through, she’s seeking Labour Party support.
- But she can’t form an understanding with Corbyn about the future while also promising to step down as PM if the withdrawal agreement is passed.
- Labour fears run deep: Since the late 80s, parts of the party have seen the EU as a constraint on the ultra-right wing side of the Conservative Party.
There are only two ways the Parliament can stop no deal: pass the withdrawal agreement or revoke Article 50.
- The EU could still refuse another extension.
- Whatever the calculations Macron or Merkel might make, the European Parliament elections are a short-term contingency, and Brexit has the potential to cause chaos.
- The EU keep saying that they want clarity about what the UK is going to do—but British domestic politics cannot provide that right now.
The only way an agreement with Labour will work is if they believe that May’s government will continue through the end of the year. Is that possible?
- What about the Labour leadership? When Corbyn seems to move toward accepting Brexit, he gets pulled back.
- In the last general election, the most irreconcilable remainers voted for a Labour party that was committed to voting to leave the EU instead of the party that represented their views (the Lib Dems). A lot of difficulties followed from this.
What about the DUP?
- They’re more worried about betrayal at the hands of the Conservatives than a Corbyn government.
- Arlene Foster has admitted that the Union comes before Brexit.
- There is no constitutional or institutional channel for English nationalism.
- If Brexit is thwarted because of Northern Ireland, there will probably be some kind of backlash.
The basic fact of British political life is that there is no transmission mechanism from the legislative to the executive of an expression of will.
- Parliament wants to say they have no confidence in the government to conduct these negotiations, but they aren’t willing to bring the government down.
- Could the constitution assert itself? Could the government fall?
- The easiest way out might be if the EU denies an extension, leading to a binary choice between the withdrawal agreement and no deal.
Mentioned in this Episode:
Further Learning:
And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here:
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, my name's David Rundsenman and this is Talking Politics. This is one of those rare Wednesdays where it's just possible the really important thing happened on Tuesday night. And we're going to try and work out what it means. Talking politics is brought to you in |
| 0:27.4 | partnership with the London Review of Books. As politics speeds up, slow down with a subscription |
| 0:33.8 | to the LRB where Brexit and Trump are only part of a picture that includes, well, |
| 0:39.8 | everything else. Read relevant pieces and subscribe at a special rate at lrb.co.com.uk |
| 0:47.4 | forward slash talking. |
| 0:53.5 | So today it is just me and Helen. |
| 0:56.8 | I was saying beforehand, I don't know how it'll be for anyone else, but for me this is therapy. |
| 1:01.2 | Helen Thompson is Professor of Political Economy here in Cambridge and has been on this podcast |
| 1:06.6 | just about as much as I have and we've been talking about this for a long time, and we haven't |
| 1:12.1 | got any plans for this conversation. It's like therapy. We're going to see where it goes, |
| 1:16.4 | but I think I know where we might start. Last night, Theresa May gave a three-minute statement, |
| 1:22.0 | which may or may not be one of the most consequential things to happen in British politics for a long |
| 1:25.6 | time, in which effectively she changed strategy, she's been trying to get her withdrawal agreement through with the support |
| 1:32.9 | of the Brexiteers in her party and the DUP that has not worked and now she's going to try and get |
| 1:38.7 | it through with support from the Labour Party, either the leadership or if that doesn't work from Labour MPs. |
| 1:47.0 | I think there's some political logic to it, which will come on to, but there seems to me to be one |
| 1:50.6 | fundamental flaw here. So she said in her speech last night, which I thought she delivered with |
| 1:56.1 | quite a lot of conviction, that for this to work, her withdrawal agreement has to pass. And then she will try and |
| 2:03.5 | agree with Jeremy Corbyn or through indicative votes in the Commons some shared understanding of |
| 2:10.4 | the future relationship, which will probably be, for one of a better phrase, a softer |
| 2:14.4 | version of Brexit. It may involve a customs union. Yet, a couple of |
| 2:18.4 | weeks ago, she said, she now understands that if her withdrawal agreement passes, it will be for |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

