5 • 1.3K Ratings
🗓️ 26 April 2022
⏱️ 51 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
A podcast comparing and contrasting three philosophies of how to “be a man” and how those philosophies conceptualize masculinity and gender.
Get an ad-free podcast feed here: https://www.patreon.com/matthiasjbarker
Citations:
De Beauvoir, S. (2010). The second sex. Knopf.
The section on the feminist split of cultural feminists and the integration of queer-theory can be seen in more detail here:
Halley, J. (2002). A Map of Feminist and Queer Theories of Sexuality and Sexual Regulation. YouTube. Retrieved April 7, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oALlk8bxB2g&t=2614s.
Costa Jr, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of personality and social psychology
Much of the argumentation regarding a modernist perspective on gender temperament and how it conflicts with post-modernism is inspired by lectures I’ve heard from Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris, and James Lindsay (all well-known modernists).
Regarding the Jungian theory around the arch of manhood:
Jung, C. G., Von Franz, M. L., Henderson, J. L., Jaffé, A., & Jacobi, J. (1964). Man and his symbols (Vol. 5183). Dell.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | What does it mean to be a man? Is manhood something that needs to be reorganized and rewritten? |
0:06.9 | Is manhood under attack? Yes, all good questions. I want to take you on a philosophical approach |
0:13.4 | through this question. Not so much me telling you what my philosophy is. More so me take |
0:18.6 | new on a journey through what I see to be the different options philosophically on how |
0:21.8 | to answer this question. And there's a reason I'm approaching it philosophically in this |
0:26.0 | case because I mean as I see I think there's three main options that you can have to both |
0:30.4 | define masculinity and then that's going to be prescriptive for then how you live it out. |
0:36.6 | So how you correct it or how you fulfill it or how you perform it is going to be dependent |
0:41.7 | upon the philosophical infrastructure of what you think masculinity or what you think gender |
0:47.6 | for that matter is. And then that could give us some guidance on what to do next. I think |
0:52.9 | there's a lot of people who genuinely want to get it right. Like there's a lot of people |
0:55.9 | in this conversation where they're trying to kind of narrow down on which parts of masculinity |
1:00.2 | are toxic and like what are the should nots of masculinity and and that seems pretty clear. |
1:05.4 | There's a lot of conversation around the should nots. But it's harder to find prescriptions |
1:09.7 | for what you should be doing. Like what does proper masculinity look like when it's acted |
1:15.3 | out like practically. And and I think there's three answers to that question. I think people |
1:20.2 | answer that question differently depending on how you construct it. So I'm going to do my |
1:23.9 | best to do justice to each of these philosophical schools. But you should know maybe going in. I'm |
1:29.5 | not like a trained historical philosopher in the sense of like I haven't been trained on these |
1:35.1 | psychological schools and how they manifest that. I'm kind of an amateur in that sense of |
1:38.9 | trying to put all that together. But I did my homework and I did my best here. But I am a trained |
1:43.9 | philosopher in the sense of I'm a psychotherapist and every psychotherapist is a philosopher. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Matthias Barker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Matthias Barker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.