meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Talking Politics: HISTORY OF IDEAS

Marx and Engels on Revolution

Talking Politics: HISTORY OF IDEAS

Talking Politics

Politics, News & Politics, News

4.81.6K Ratings

🗓️ 1 May 2020

⏱️ 44 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Communist Manifesto (1848) remains the most famous revolutionary text of all. But what was the problem with politics that only a revolution could solve?  And why were the working class the only people who could solve it? David explores what Marx and Engels really had to say about capitalism, crisis and class and he asks what still resonates from that message today.


Free online version of the text:

Recommended version to purchase: 

Going Deeper:




Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, I'm Catherine Carr, producer of Talking Politics.

0:13.6

In today's episode of History of Ideas,

0:16.2

David discusses Karl Marx and Friedrich Engel's Communist Manifesto.

0:21.5

It was written in 1848 the year of revolution, but that wasn't the revolution they were after.

0:28.0

They wanted something much bigger.

0:43.0

Talking Politics, history of ideas is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books, Europe's leading literary magazine. After each episode, continue your exploration of the history of ideas in their unrivaled

0:49.0

archive of essays and reviews, films and podcasts podcasts and find out more about how a subscription to the LRB

0:56.8

can be an indispensable home learning and student resource

1:00.4

by heading over to their website

1:02.4

LRB.r.

1:03.4

me forward slash ideas.

1:06.0

That's L.r.

1:08.0

dot me forward slash ideas.

1:17.0

So far in these talks, I haven't said much about the economic side of modern political life, all those economic relationships that coexist

1:26.1

with the political relationships I have been talking about. And the authors that I've discussed so far

1:32.0

all had quite a lot to say about what we would now call economics in different ways.

1:37.0

They had different interests.

1:38.0

Hobbs, for instance, was very interested in money and how it worked and he was absolutely adamant that the power of the sovereign state

1:46.7

as well as determining what counted as peace also had to determine what counted as money. The sovereign had to say what money was.

1:56.7

And so it's possible if Hobbs were alive now and he was looking at our world,

2:02.0

who knows what he would think. I can't quite imagine.

2:04.4

He probably would think he was right. And he told us if he got our state sorted, we would be so

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Talking Politics, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Talking Politics and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.