the Luciferian satanic nature of feminism. A lot of people think of feminism as a political

movement as some sort of movement for equality. But really the whole presuppositions of equality

and equalitarianism might themselves be the problem. In other words, we might have senses

in a philosophical sense in which people are equal. There might be other senses in which they're also unequal.

So maybe both things are the case.

And you'll notice in a lot of political movements that are based around Higalian dialectics

and getting people divided, they will trade on everything being one kind of distinction.

We're all either absolutely identical and

the same, and because I'm got a monoculture, or it's unfair, and everyone is oppressor oppressed

in the sort of totem pole Olympics of oppression, right? And I noticed I was watching a debate with

Pearl and a bunch of feminists the other day. And Pearl made the point that feminism just

trades on this sort of equality narrative, which isn't really justified. And all of the people in

the audience were then basically going into debating, they were going into proving how they were

more oppressed than the other person. And so it was like a domino effect of like oppression to see he was the most oppressed.

And that somehow became the primary special specimen, the most, like the top of the

total pole, but it was always like the most degenerate thing.

Like the most de-jointed, like the, like lesbian, Lesbian Buffalo Bill, the Muslim, Jeffrey Dahmer is like the highest totem,

like the top of the totem pole.

So how is it that this is the highest level of most oppressed,

but now the most revered?

And to me that suggests that all of this is inversion.

And my guest, Brittany Selner, is going to be joining me here because I want to talk to her.

...