4.7 • 1.5K Ratings
🗓️ 29 June 2023
⏱️ 51 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
William Morris is renowned for his work as an artist and designer. But he was also one of Britain's greatest socialist thinkers. Morris combined his opposition to capitalism with a deep understanding of environmental questions that was rare in his own time.
Matthew Beaumont, professor of English at University College London and author of books including The Spectre of Utopia and Nightwalking: A Nocturnal History of London, joins Long Reads to discuss the life and thought of William Morris.
Read Matthew's essay, "The Socialist Imagination of William Morris" here: https://jacobin.com/2023/04/william-morris-socialism-communism-arts-crafts
Long Reads is a Jacobin podcast looking in-depth at political topics and thinkers, both contemporary and historical, with the magazine’s longform writers. Hosted by features editor Daniel Finn. Produced by Conor Gillies, music by Knxwledge.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hello, you're very welcome to Long Reads, a Jacobin podcast where we look in depth at |
0:05.9 | political topics and thinkers. My name's Daniel Finn, and the features editor here at Jacobin, |
0:11.6 | and I'll be presenting the show. William Morris is renowned for his work as an artist and designer, |
0:18.5 | but he was also one of Britain's greatest socialist thinkers. Morris combined his |
0:23.4 | opposition to capitalism with a deep understanding of environmental questions that was rare in his |
0:28.6 | own time. Our guest today is Matthew Beaumont. He's a professor of English at University College |
0:35.2 | London, and his books include The Spectre of Utopia. Many people will be familiar with William |
0:42.8 | Morris, perhaps primarily as an artist and a designer who still has a very high reputation to this day, |
0:50.1 | but he was also deeply engaged with the world of politics. How did Morris define himself politically? |
0:56.9 | Well, he defined himself as a communist from the mid-1880s. It was a long journey to that point, |
1:04.9 | but he firmly asserted that communism was the ideology with which he identified in the last |
1:12.0 | 10 years of his life. There are various reasons for doing that. Socialism was an extremely |
1:19.2 | factional and fissiporous entity in the late 19th century in England, and he believed that |
1:26.9 | socialists on the whole were those who identified themselves with a reformist tradition, |
1:32.7 | so he was in calling himself a communist, identifying whether or the different revolutionary |
1:38.1 | tradition derived from the Paris commune among other things. But you're absolutely right to say |
1:45.6 | that that will come as a surprise to many people today, because he is very much associated still |
1:51.3 | with the textiles and tapestries that one finds in museums all over the world, and in sort of bourgeois |
1:58.2 | drawing rooms, as it were. He was almost concertedly turned into what Robin Page Arnott in 1934 |
2:06.8 | called a harmless saint. He was a sort of bourgeois saint, a saint of bourgeois design for many, |
2:13.8 | many decades, and it wasn't until various scholars and particular socialist ones like E.P. Thompson |
2:19.5 | started to take another look at him and to open up the revolutionary tradition that he had himself |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jacobin, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Jacobin and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.