This is CBSI in the world. I'm John Batcher with my colleague in friend Joseph Sternberg

and the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal who's in London running political economics.

However, I depend upon Joe to tell me how to read the London Times and the London Telegraph

and the Daily Mail and all the tabloids that are now featuring. Harry admits that claim

made in trial contradicts spare. The Duke of Sussex has admitted in court that a claim

made to the high court in his phone hacking claim against mere group newspaper does not align

with his memoir. Joe, what the heck is going on? The king is crowned. The empire is trying

to restore itself. Why is Harry on the front page again? Is this an obsession?

It's hard to say why he's on the front page and frankly when gets the impression that a lot of

people here in the UK are increasingly exhausted by this. I mean, this is one of a series of

lawsuits that Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, have filed against various media

enterprises in the UK principally to do with the media coverage of the couple.

My understanding not being a lawyer or particularly familiar with the ins and outs of this is that

some of the cases have been more merited than others and I don't have a particular opinion

about the current one. But I think that what people here are noticing is that this is not necessarily

the sort of behavior that you would expect from people who claim as Harry and Meghan do to want

to stay out of the public limelight. You know, you've got a wapper when it turns on whether the

prince remembers wanting to meet his mother's former butler. I mean, he gets that confusing.

Sometimes I think Connoah missed a trick or two because he wouldn't write about the royal family.

Joe, this is utterly mundane. I can't follow it. I have a scorecard here.

Is it possible that they put Prince Harry on the cover? This is a London Times. They did include

video from the flooding of a whole river valley but at the same time, these are not, this is not

...