This is the Friends of History Debating Society.

I'm John Bachelor Gaius, and Germanicus Michael Laius is here, Londinium, 91 AD.

It's cold.

Wintertime, the centurians and their families have gone on.

We've kept the candles lit, we're going to the theater later, but right now we're keen on the 21st century

and surprising developments in the last few days.

U.S. National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby,

writes I.S.

stated on January 11th that the US has suspended security assistance to Ukraine

and will not resume sending aid to Ukraine until U.S. Congress approves funding.

Kirby stated that the U.S. provided the last package of aid to Ukraine, that the U.S. had

enough funding for 250 million security assistance package announced December 27th, 2023.

Germanicus, there it is.

The U.S. has turned its back on Ukraine until Congress

approves the likelihood is minimal to none the funding drives the. Ukraine doesn't have any money. The funding is what

sustains the idea of Ukraine's resistance. This is not just a problem for Ukraine, it's a problem for NATO. The U.S. has

turned its back. How soon for the other countries to turn their back. Why should they

continue the pipeline into Ukraine?

Germanicus, the problem here is Ukraine has lost and will not acknowledge it or perhaps

some elements of Ukraine will not acknowledge it or perhaps some elements of Ukraine will not acknowledge it.

Perhaps Vladimir Putin knows they've lost but President Selensky doesn't know they lost.

Is the problem Selensky himself?

...