meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
On Being with Krista Tippett

Living the Questions: What does civility actually mean, and is it enough?

On Being with Krista Tippett

On Being Studios

Sociology, Spirituality, Religion & Spirituality, Krista Tippett, Arts, Culture, On Being, Society, Society & Culture, Science, Social Sciences

4.710.2K Ratings

🗓️ 3 December 2018

⏱️ 17 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A question from Kevin: “I have been hearing a lot of deconstruction of the word ‘civility.’ The debate around this word has become, like so many other things, binary. ‘Civility’ is either a tool of oppressors to silence those on the margins, or it is something that is necessary for every single conversation and dialogue. I’d love to hear something about this word — what it actually means, in what contexts can it be helpful, in what contexts can it be used as a tool to silence anger.” Takeaways from the podcast: What is the inner work of civility that goes deeper than the surface of our encounters with each other? What is the goal of civility? “My concern for a while has been that the word is too meek; that it’s about being nice and tame and safe, and I don’t think stepping into any of the dark places and the fraught places right now can be nice or tame or safe. I always reach for other words to attach, like ‘muscular’—it has to be muscular, it has to be robust—this language we use in the Grounding Virtues, ‘adventurous civility.’ It needs to be an adventure.” “To use civility to silence anger is using a simplistic, binary understanding of civility as a kind of passive-aggressive weapon. And that’s not what I mean when I use the word.” “Civility is internal work that each of us needs to do.” “A question we fail to ask, so much, in American life is not just, what do I want to happen here; what do I have to say; what do I care about; what is at stake? But, what is the most effective way that my words can be heard? What is the most emotionally intelligent way, which is also going to be a productive way, that I can embody and represent and give voice to what I care deeply about?” “Creating spaces and experiences of robust, adventurous civility is actually very strategically effective because what you’re doing is you’re creating a space in which it is reasonable to ask people, smart people, complicated people who’ve been through complicated things, to let themselves get uncomfortable in the presence of a stranger.” “I am passionate about what I am passionate about. I’m scared about what I’m scared about, or I’m angry about what I’m angry about. And I know there are things I don’t understand, and I don’t want to stay this way forever, and I don’t want us to stay stuck here forever. So, I want to change and grow, and I invite you to be with me in that spirit too, and let’s see what happens.” About the Living the Questions series, from Krista Tippett: “I think of a good conversation as an adventure. You create a generous and trustworthy space for it, and prepare hospitably for it, so the other person will feel so welcome and understood that they will put words around something they have never put words around quite that way before. They will give voice to something they didn’t know they knew — and you will be a witness to thinking, revelation, in real time. This is one reason that radio/podcasting is such a magical medium: Everyone who listens joins that room, becomes a witness, the moment they push ‘play.’ They are also there for the revelation. It’s a form of time travel. And if the conversation is edifying (one of my favorite, underused words), we all sync up in some mysterious way across time and space and grow a little together. In recent years, I’ve discovered that I really like being on the other side of a conversation too. Maybe because I’ve experienced that thrill of revelation so many times, I approach someone asking questions of me with great anticipation of what they will draw out of me that I can’t draw out of myself. So, last summer on social media, my colleagues and I asked for questions you’d want to throw at me. We received, and continue to receive, such a bounty.” Find more at onbeing.org/series/living-the-questions/.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, on Being Listeners. This is Marie Samvelay, and in this episode of Living the Questions,

0:06.1

Christus responding to a question that one of our listeners sent in. His name is Kevin,

0:10.6

and he asks,

0:11.6

I have been hearing a lot of deconstruction of the word civility. The debate around this

0:16.5

word has become like so many other things, binary. Civility is either a tool of oppressors

0:22.5

to silence those on the margins, or it's something that is necessary for every single conversation

0:27.9

and dialogue. I'd love to hear something about this word. What it actually means, in what context

0:33.9

it can be helpful, and what context it can be used as a tool to silence anger.

0:38.2

Civility is a tool to silence anger. I feel like that's a new invention. I totally agree that

0:55.5

the word is problematic, and the concept as this question suggests has even become problematic.

1:06.5

My concern for a while has been that the word is too meek, that it's about being nice and tame and safe,

1:20.4

and I don't think stepping into any of the dark places and the frot places right now can be nice

1:33.4

or tame or safe. I was reached for other words to attach muscular. It has to be muscular. It has to be

1:41.9

robust. This language we use in the grounding virtues, adventurous civility. It needs to be an

1:48.4

adventure. This moment we inhabit is so complex because I want to say two things at once that I

2:00.9

think sound like they contradict each other. One is that if safety is endangered, I'm not saying that

2:10.2

I think many people in many situations right now have a calling to get saved. They need to protect

2:20.0

themselves. They need to protect those they love. That is true. Then I think that those of us who are

2:31.3

safe enough also have a calling to get less comfortable. When I say that an adventurous civility

2:42.6

is not too tame, it's not too safe, that's what I mean. It's not a calling for everybody in every

2:48.6

moment. I don't agree that every situation calls for civility. I think the question itself points

2:55.2

to part of the rut we're in, which is that we turn everything into these simplistic binaries.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from On Being Studios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of On Being Studios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.