4.8 • 1.2K Ratings
🗓️ 24 October 2023
⏱️ ? minutes
Let's discus the latest epidemiological study attempting to vilify meat yet ignoring healthy user bias of study participants.
Support your Workout Sessions and Healthy Hydration with the Electrolyte + Creatine Combo by MYOXCIENCE: https://bit.ly/electrolyte-stix
*Save 12% with code podcast at checkout
Link to expanded show notes & video review: https://bit.ly/3FrEq1H
Studies Mentioned:
Gu, X. et al. Red meat intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in a prospective cohort study of United States females and males. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. (2023) doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.08.021.
Study Time Stamps:
00:55 The Harvard study is flawed, comparing a healthy population to an unhealthy population.
04:18 Hazard ratio is the odds of an event or lifestyle contributing to a disease.
05:35 Red meat does not spike glucose and insulin to the same degree as soda.
06:45 Look at the baseline characteristics of study participants.
12:55 Processed meats are generally unhealthy.
16:25 Increasing red meat consumption usually results in less body fat.
20:05 They did not track sugar-sweetened beverages, which increase the risk of diabetes.
22:25 The study was funded by an NIH grant.
22:35 Vegans and vegetarians eat the most ultra processed food.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mike Mutzel, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Mike Mutzel and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.