I almost hit end stream because it didn't go live quite fast enough.

Ladies and gentlemen, we're live on stream yard so I can't do my Rumble studio voiceover.

So I'm going to do it right now.

Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, I will play this quick video for you while we get things set up with Oathkeeper Stuart Rhodes. This is the appellate

hearing of Tina Peters persecution where the people, and I put the people in quotes, because it's

the government persecuting the people, arguing that Tina Peters should be locked up on a felony

despite the jury instructions

having been only for a misdemeanor so that when the jury found her guilty, they found

her guilty of a felony despite the fact that it ought to have only been a misdemeanor.

You'll understand when you hear it.

Listen.

Is it your position that a person can still be convicted of a crime with which they were never

charged and with which the jury was never instructed as long as the evidence is sufficient?

Yes, I think that that is what the case law indicates.

In this case, I'll just point out, too, that, you know, I don't have the language of

the, you know, the statutes that you're citing in your hypothetical, but it was one word, might. And it was already, but that one word distinguishes it from a felony to a misdemeanor. And look at her face, the face of a sniveling rat. This is the prosecutor. Oh, yeah, yeah. It's, it's, you know, bygones,

bygones. Look, and listen to her inability to answer the question. Her inability to answer

the question is almost as bad as that so-called doctor from yesterday, refusing to answer whether

or not men can get pregnant. This is made an extra sentence, 15 more months in the Department of Corrections that

couldn't have been given had it been a misdemeanor conviction.

It clearly affects a substantial right.

And I'll just say I'm confused as to why the people are continuing to maintain that the proper remedy on this isn't to enter the conviction for the misdemeanor because the indictment used the word might and the jury was instructed on that. So that's what the verdict is. I am baffled as to the position that's being taken that we can somehow overlook that and still enter the

...