We looked at the baseline characteristics of the study participants.

We're comparing unhealthy people to more healthy people and where

the scientists are Harvard are trying to make the claim that the differentiating

factor here is the red meat. But as I alluded to, this is a classic example of healthy user bias.

The people who ate the least amount of red meat exercised more, they smoked less, they drank less alcohol,

they ate less calories, they took multivitamins, they were generally healthier. Hey,

waiting for the system to let me know that we are live. We're going to break down a new study.

Believe it or not, Harvard scientists are trying to make the claim that eating red meat will raise your

risk of developing type tube diabetes to an equivalent amount of drinking five sodas per week.

This is preposterous. We're going to break down an epidemiological study that was recently

published. It was Thursday of last week about four or five days ago and it is getting a lot of media

attention. A lot of folks are citing this article right here. I want to thank of live my friends. I really appreciate you tuning in with us live. Hopefully you can see and hear me

okay. If so hit that like button. Let me know in the comment section where you are viewing this from live. We have quite a few folks on with us now.

I'm gonna pop out the chat. Any question is fair game, nutrition, fasting,

exercise, dietary supplements. So let's dive into it. This study exemplifies all of the problems

with epidemiological studies.

And usually that entails healthy user bias,

as we're going to talk about, the people who ate the most red meat

exercised the least.

They smoked significantly more.

They drank more alcohol. They ate more calories.

So we're comparing a healthier population to an unhealthy population, my friends, and that is the problem.

...