Live at the NCC: Policing, Protests, and the Constitution Part 2
We the People
National Constitution Center
4.6 • 1.1K Ratings
🗓️ 11 June 2020
⏱️ 58 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | I'm Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, and welcome |
| 0:10.1 | to We The People, a weekly show of constitutional debate. |
| 0:14.3 | The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan non-profit chartered by Congress to increase |
| 0:20.8 | awareness and understanding of the Constitution among the American people. |
| 0:26.0 | During these challenging times, increasing awareness and understanding of the Constitution is more urgently important than ever |
| 0:35.3 | so that we can learn together in order to form a more perfect union. |
| 0:41.5 | It is central to the National Constitution Center's mission to convene discussions |
| 0:46.4 | like the one we held last Friday, a national town hall discussion about policing protests and the Constitution. |
| 0:55.0 | We'll share that town hall today with you in two parts. |
| 0:59.0 | Part two features some of America's most distinguished scholars on policing protests and the Constitution. |
| 1:06.8 | Professor Monica Bell of Yale Law School, David French, the writer and constitutional lawyer, Janay Nelson of the NAACP Legal Defense |
| 1:17.1 | Fund, and Professor Ted Shaw of the University of North Carolina. |
| 1:23.0 | The Constitution Center will be convening more of these town hall discussions in the weeks ahead. Thank you for learning with us and for tuning in to We the People and our Companion Podcast, live at the National Constitution |
| 1:35.7 | Center, to learn more in the weeks ahead. |
| 1:40.6 | It is an honor to welcome all of you to our town hall. |
| 1:44.0 | Let's begin with this question of qualified immunity for police officers. |
| 1:49.0 | There's so many questions about it. |
| 1:50.0 | There are bills pending in Congress to reform it. |
| 1:54.0 | What I want to put on the table is how precisely it evolved. |
| 1:59.0 | Monica, tell us what the Ku Klux Klan Act after reconstruction said about how citizens could sue for violations |
| 2:08.4 | of their constitutional rights and how the Supreme Court more recently developed and expanded this notion of qualified immunity that's controversial today. |
| 2:17.0 | Yeah, so I'm actually going to defer to another panelist to talk a little bit more about that doctrinal history. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Constitution Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of National Constitution Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

