LGBTQ Employees’ Rights at the Supreme Court
We the People
National Constitution Center
4.6 • 1.1K Ratings
🗓️ 18 June 2020
⏱️ 54 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | I'm Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center and welcome to We |
| 0:08.0 | the People, a weekly show of constitutional debate. |
| 0:11.3 | The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan nonprofit chartered by |
| 0:15.2 | Congress to increase awareness and understanding of the Constitution among |
| 0:19.6 | the American people. This week the Supreme Court handed down Bostick versus Clayton County, Georgia and two related cases. |
| 0:27.0 | They held that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. |
| 0:36.1 | On today's episode, we'll discuss this landmark decision with two leading scholars of the Supreme |
| 0:41.8 | Court. |
| 0:42.8 | Joshua Matz is a partner at Kaplan, He Hacker, and Think, LLP. |
| 0:47.2 | He recently rejoined the firm from the House Judiciary Committee, where he served as counsel |
| 0:51.4 | for the impeachment and trial of President Trump. |
| 0:54.8 | He is the author with Professor Lawrence Tribe of To End a Presidency, and he filed a brief in this case in support of the employees on behalf of former solicitors |
| 1:06.7 | General. |
| 1:07.7 | Joshua, it's great to have you back on the show. |
| 1:10.3 | Thank you for having me. |
| 1:11.7 | Matthew Frank is the Associate Director of the James Madison program in American ideals and institutions |
| 1:16.7 | and lecture in politics at Princeton University. |
| 1:19.4 | He's also a Senior Fellow at the Witherspoon Institute at Princeton and Professor |
| 1:24.2 | Emeritus of Political Science at Radford University. Matthew thank you so much |
| 1:28.7 | for joining. Great to be with you Jeff, thanks. Let's jump right into the decision. |
| 1:34.0 | Joshua, what did the court hold and what was Justice's Gorsuch's legal theory |
| 1:41.0 | for the holding? |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Constitution Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of National Constitution Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

