Well, howdy there internet people, let's be it again. So today we are going to talk

about the former president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, and the second day of deliberations in his New York

entanglement. And what we'll do is run through the events of yesterday and then talk about and what the experts, the legal analysts seem to think that those events mean,

and then talk about what the experts, the legal analysts,

seem to think that those events mean.

And just kind of go over everything as things restart.

Okay, so yesterday, Trump's New York entanglement, it went to the jury.

Seven men, five women, spent four and a half hours deliberating.

During this period, they asked for two things. They asked for a

readback of a certain section of testimony and that testimony what they asked.

And they asked for clarification on jury instructions.

That's what they asked for.

And they had not reached a decision yet.

Okay, so what do the experts say? They say that that kind of means one of two things.

One is that they're deliberating the way a jury should.

Asking for evidence that is central to the case

and jury instructions could be indicative of that.

The other popular opinion is that you have one person who is holding out and the jury is trying to convince them.

Here's this important piece of testimony. here are the jury instructions. This is why

we have to find this way kind of thing. Now given that information it's not really a consensus but I would say that

most believe when you're talking about the legal analysts, the experts, it seems that most

believe that at this point it is unlikely that Trump is acquitted.

...