Well, howdy there, internet people, it's about again.

So today I'm going to talk about an idea that I have.

And we're going to talk about the amendments and the mythology that follows them.

And we're going to follow what people believe

is the founder's intent behind the amendments.

And we're gonna see if it lands where people think it does.

You know, and I have my questions about this you know I'm not a

a second guy I'm a first guy I have a press a modern day equivalent of one. But the mythology around the second is fascinating. It's

fascinating and it's not untrue. It's not untrue the thread that is the thread that's followed by those who

are see the second is like part of their identity there their contribution to the country, their way of being a

patriot, it's not untrue.

They may view it the same way I view this. It's not the whole story but it's not untrue. If you

ask them those people who are just incorporating the second into their identity,

if you ask them what it's for, why the second exists, what do they say?

You ask them.

And you know at first you say they'll give you some like soft answer.

But then when you ask them, why do you need parity with the military?

They'll tell you.

The idea is to be able to to fight back in the event of tyranny.

That's cool. I mean it's it's it's dangerous to go alone. Take this. It's like the

founders put up a piece of glass you know, break glass only in the event of tyranny.

It's cool. It's cool rhetoric, it's cool mythology.

...