Well, howdy there internet people? Let's Bo again. So today we are going to talk about something

that's going to sound really familiar, but it's not. Last month we discussed how Scientific American broke with I don't know

almost 200 years of tradition and endorsed a political candidate when they

endorsed Joe Biden.

Yesterday, the New England Journal of Medicine,

which is a pretty prestigious medical journal, didn't endorse a

candidate, but they had some things to say and this is a this is a journal that is notoriously

a political.

When it comes to the response to the largest public health crisis of our time, our current

political leaders have demonstrated that they are dangerously incompetent.

We should not abet them and enable the deaths of thousands more Americans by allowing

them to keep their jobs. The response of our nation's

leaders has been consistently inadequate. This crisis has produced a test of leadership.

Here in the United States, our leaders have failed that test.

They have taken a crisis and turned it into a tragedy.

Goes on, those are some select quotes. It also talks about how our testing is below that of Kazakhstan,

Zimbabwe, and Ethiopia.

It's pretty pointed. It is pretty pointed. It is pretty pointed. It talks about how some governors did all right, some didn't, and that that didn't have anything to do with party.

It also talks about and that didn't have anything to do with party.

It also talks about how many politicians politicized the use of masks.

At the end of the day, this is, again, it's not an endorsement of Biden.

It's kind of just saying that Trump needs to lose, which is a sentiment I can get behind.

...