Well, howdy there internet people, let's bow again.

So today we are going to talk about UAPs, you, UFOs, that's what we're gonna talk about.

Because I got a question,

and if you don't know, the US government

is starting to take this concept a little bit more seriously.

And one of the things that has prompted a lot of people to have questions is they look at these cases, the government looks

at them, and 98% of them are completely explainable, but they want to keep the investigations going, they want more data, and a word that keeps coming up is stigma.

They want to remove the stigma when it comes to reporting this stuff.

And the question is, if everything's pretty much explainable,

why do they want to keep looking into it and why do they care about the stigma?

Being explainable doesn't necessarily mean it's something that's supposed to be there.

I think a lot of people are looking at this through the lens of X-files. They might should be looking more through the lens of air defense Naval Defense, as I guess this now includes undersea entities.

They want to remove this stigma, my pilots, military pilots, to be very free in coming forward and saying, hey, I saw something really weird and

wasn't supposed to be there. Not because they think it's from outside of this planet, but it

might be from outside of the United States. I think the reason the government is starting to show more and more interest in this,

and especially now that they're trying and actually using the word, trying to get rid of the stigma.

I think it's because they want people to report things that might be a foreign origin rather than alien origin.

They're worried about surveillance over flights.

They're worried about drones.

They're worried about naval drones. they want to basically create a situation

where you see something you say something.

They want to use the massive amount of naval

...