Well, howdy there internet people, it's Bow again. So today we are going to talk about Midas

Touch and Stone Kettle and myself. I've had a number of questions related to this topic.

Both Stone Kettle and Midas Touch were brought up.

So we're going to go through it because it shows the different means that can be used to reach

a conclusion.

The question is, hey, what did y'all know that the giant polling places didn't?

Because all of us at some point in time have referenced the concept of unlikely voters

and called into question the polls.

They probably didn't use the term unlikely voters.

They probably said something else.

So Midas Touch, I know what they did. They used data analysis.

I want to say they pulled early voting numbers with their registrations and

extrapolated from that. Now my understanding is that they took a lot of

static for doing it that way and took a lot of heat for it because it's unconventional.

If it was me I would be filming a giant I told you so video right now.

With Stonecettle, I mean I don't know my guess just normal cynicism. Something along the lines of, I don't know how to soften his language, something along the lines of the only people included in the polls would be those willing to answer a phone call from an unknown number

in this day and age only that would be said in a much more colorful in humorous

fashion.

I don't know that he put any analysis into it beyond

they're not talking to everybody and they're acting as though they are, which

when you're talking about polling, that's a pretty important aspect of it.

Pointing that that out probably led him to the conclusion that, hey, younger people are typically

...