Amber, how are you doing? Hey, I'm doing great. Thanks for having me. Of course. Well, I saw your substack,

there's excellent substack. Everyone in the audience needs to go be reading. If they want to really

improve their IQ, if they want to IQ Max, they should be reading Amber Duke's substack.

Your piece that you put up, I think it was yesterday regarding the legal observers, I mean,

this is something that is

driving a lot of, you know, it sort of permits a lot of these leftists to agitate to cause

problems. And it sort of ticks the protests into something else, or it's not just a protest,

it adds an extra element to it. Because you maybe expand on, you know, your piece in regards to maybe

familiarize the audience with legal observers for those who aren't and, you know, how this

ties into the situation that we saw in Minneapolis?

Yes, absolutely. So the term legal observers, which the audience has probably seen

being thrown around by a bunch of mainstream media outlets and left wing activists.

Comes from campus protests in the 1960s. It was popularized by the National Lawyers Guild, which is a left wing group.

And they fashioned this term to refer to essentially witnesses who would be on scene at protest to film police

and other officials, law enforcement officials, to make sure that they weren't basically brutalizing the protesters.

This term was used again during the BLM riots and the anti-police brutality protest that we saw about

five to ten years ago.

And it's now being brought up again in context of the anti-ice protest.

Now the problem with the term is that it implies

that these are people who have some kind of training

or credential and also some kind of special status

that prevents them from facing consequences

...