Laken Snelling: The Legal Architecture of a Manslaughter Charge Built on Concealment, a Single Word, and a Phone Full of Evidence
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Tony Brueski
4.2 β’ 612 Ratings
ποΈ 17 March 2026
β±οΈ 23 minutes
ποΈ Recording | iTunes | RSS
π§ΎοΈ Download transcript
Summary
The Laken Snelling case is built on a specific legal threshold β first-degree manslaughter, conscious disregard β and the question of whether the evidence as it currently exists can sustain that charge through trial. That is the central legal question this episode addresses.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins True Crime Today alongside Robin Dreeke for a precise legal and procedural analysis of the Snelling case β the indictment, the evidence record, and the prosecution's path forward.
The grand jury heard all four levels of criminal homicide. They landed on manslaughter. That choice β conscious disregard over negligence β is a meaningful legal finding, and Coffindaffer examines what the prosecution had to show the grand jury to get there, and what they will need to demonstrate at trial to hold it. She works through each major piece of evidence: the phone documentation, the deleted labor photos, the pregnancy tracking, the months of documented concealment, and how each element translates into legal weight under the conscious disregard standard.
The single word "guessed" β used by Snelling when hospital staff asked whether her son was alive β is analyzed in specific legal terms. Coffindaffer addresses how hedged language of that nature is used when the medical examiner has already placed "born alive" in the record, and what it means for the prosecution's intent narrative.
The roommate element is examined procedurally: whether their 4 a.m. acceptance of "I fainted" and return to bed constitutes something investigators had to formally account for, and whether it surfaces at trial.
Dreeke adds the behavioral framework that the prosecution will need to explain to a jury β particularly around why the documented concealment pattern reflects calculated awareness rather than psychological crisis, and why that distinction matters under the law.
Up to 31 years. The charge is serious. The evidence is substantial. The legal path is specific. This is the breakdown that case deserves.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LakenSnelling #TrueCrimeToday #NeonaticideKentucky #FirstDegreeManslaughter #LexingtonKentucky #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #CriminalLaw #KentuckyTrueCrime
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brewski and Robin Dree. |
| 0:07.0 | Let's talk about one more case here today. |
| 0:11.0 | Lincoln Snelly gave birth alone at 4 a.m. on August 27th, 2025 in her Lexington, Kentucky apartment. |
| 0:18.0 | Her son was found hours later by her roommates wrapped in a towel and a bag |
| 0:22.1 | in her closet, born alive, cause of death, exphyxia by undetermined means. A grand jury indicted her |
| 0:29.2 | on first-degree manslaughter. When investigators found on her phone is what makes this case a little bit |
| 0:34.4 | different. And that's where we're going to start. Her phone had |
| 0:38.0 | deleted labor photos, week-by-week pregnancy tracking, and months of active concealment while she was |
| 0:45.1 | competing at nationals and cheerleading and doing what looked like maternity photos with her boyfriend. |
| 0:52.0 | It's not really denial. What exactly is it? |
| 0:55.4 | What on earth, Jen, I'm going to start with you. |
| 0:59.8 | What do you think was going through this young woman's mind when she decided I'm going to put this baby that's making noises that I just gave birth to in a trash bag in my closet and then go out to McDonald's, which is exactly what happened. |
| 1:17.2 | I want to know the proximal event. |
| 1:20.0 | To me, this was an onset of a proximal event that happened that made her want to do this. |
| 1:26.6 | Yeah. |
| 1:27.2 | So I want to see a breakup, something with a breakup, something to do with her finding out that |
| 1:34.9 | really, remember there were two boyfriends that really somehow she found out it was one |
| 1:39.2 | boyfriend, not the other one. |
| 1:41.0 | She thought it was. |
| 1:42.6 | There's a proximal event. i believe that she said either in |
| 1:47.5 | your face you're never going to be the father to this child or yeah you're going to break up with me |
| 1:53.9 | in your face i'm going to kill your kid i know that sounds so rough but i really believe that there's |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright Β© Tapesearch 2026.

