This kind of strikes me as from the department of you don't say. Right? Yeah, from the well-du

category. I mean, you should go without saying or it should go without saying. However,

apparently we have to put it out there. The State Department is telling

people not to go to Iran. Yeah, it's like when they put the warning label on like the tide pods,

like don't eat this. Like you know somebody did it at one point, which is why they have to put

the warning label on there. This feels to me like the same thing. Like you know somebody's still

going to try and do it.

So the government comes out and says, hey, Americans don't travel to Iran under any circumstances.

I didn't even know you could go to Iran.

Like, I thought that was like North Korea where there was like no entry.

I mean, what what possible reason would there be to go to? To Tehran? Yeah, like what, oh man, it's like when Kev was putting together his family

vacation, they narrowed it down to what, England or Iran and England just barely won out.

Who is going to Iran? Yeah. The State Department, they said that

the conflict is rapidly evolving. It's a very fluid situation right now. So Trump, look,

I do not think the tweeting stuff is helpful on military conflict, international conflicts,

like stuff where you're having to be

commander-in-chief person in real time.

I do not think it's helpful.

I think the goal should be,

the goal for everybody should be to de-escalate the conflict

and get Iran in check, like permanently. But a military conflict is not going to do anything for anyone

because how is the post-World War II track record of military conflicts with nation-building

...