This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Bruske and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reed.

Picture this. You are in a courtroom where the defense attorney is literally pounding his fist on the lectern,

screaming about prosecutorial misconduct

because someone dared to mention that no dog DNA was found on the victim's clothing.

That's kind of the reason.

This is the same defense team.

They want you to believe a Boston police officer was allegedly mauled to death

by a German Shepherd named Chloe in someone's basement, then dragged outside and planted in a

snowbank. But at that time, there was no snowbank. So just out in the middle of their yard,

to just out in the middle of their yard to frame their client.

Welcome to June 3rd in the Karen Reid trial where the defense's desperation has reached levels

that would make a reality TV show producer, maybe blush a little bit.

Welcome.

Want to hear your thoughts in the comments if you're watching us on YouTube or X.

And if you're listening to the podcast, be sure to check us out over there so you can conversate with us.

And we can hear your opinions as well. Hit subscribe everybody wherever you're

watching too, whether it's YouTube X if it's a wherever podcast platform you're listening on

Apple, Spotify, wherever you may be, we're everywhere. Do hit subscribe so you don't miss any of our

coverage of the case. All right, let's get down to it. If you've been following this Massachusetts murder case,

you know that it started as a fairly straightforward drunk driving homicide case and is now

somehow morphed into what can only be described as a legal fever dream involving canine

conspiracies and evidence tampering theories that would make

...