This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Bruske and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reed.

This piece actually here, I think, is the most powerful of the day. I actually went to the wrong one first. But this is, I think, the first time today. He clearly stated what his thoughts are. There's another one after this.

We'll talk about where he talks about the side swipe.

But this, I think, was pretty powerful today in the trial.

Then go to the right slide.

There we go.

In addition to the text stream data you consider,

considering both of those areas of information,

do you have an opinion to a reasonable degree of engineering certainty and whether the damage to the defendant's flexus is consistent with a collision with Mr. John O'Keefe on January 29th,

2000, 22 at around 1232 a.m.

So there's been two potential theories that I've seen on that issue.

One is a glass was thrown at the rear of the vehicle and shattered it. The second one was an impact to the arm. If the impact is basically more than approximately eight miles an hour, it will likely break the taillight lens.

Do you have an opinion whether based on the data and based on the physical damage and

your testing, whether that is consistent with a collision or a impact with Mr. John O'Keefe?

It is consistent with a collision as long as it's greater than approximately eight miles an hour.

You have an opinion whether it's consistent with an impact or collision with Mr. John O'Keefe on January 29,

2020 at around 12.32 a.m. With that caveat, yes.

In your testing, did you consider, or do you have an opinion to a reasonable degree of engineering certainty,

whether John O'Kee's injuries on his arm, and inevitably in the back of his head,

are consistent with being struck by a Lexus identical to the defendant's Lexus on January 29th, 2022.

Yes.

What's your opinion?

...