4.9 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 3 April 2025
⏱️ 6 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
The prosecution wants access to texts between Karen Read and Aidan Kearney. The texts are sought to show Read's "consciousness of guilt," not to prosecute Kearney. Judge Sisitsky gets mad because the prosecution want texts involving attorneys or others in group threads.
The judge clarified that the order was very narrow: only direct conversations between Read and Kearney would be turned over. Outcome is pending on the motion for protective order of Aidan Kearney.
Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/An_t-g5Wueo
RESOURCES
Previous Hearing with Judge Sisitsky - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e9BfCqOIvs
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome back. It's time for a quick bit clip. The full episode will be linked in the description, |
0:05.7 | but this is the quick bit clip to keep you in the loop for everything that's happening on the |
0:11.1 | live stream channel. Let's get into it. It's Tuesday. It is April 1st. We are going to go to court |
0:17.9 | today for a hearing from Friday in the Karen Reed case adjacent. |
0:22.6 | We have the prosecution trying to get to text messages between Karen Reed and Aidan Carney. |
0:30.0 | The Commonwealth is trying to get to text messages between the two of them. |
0:33.2 | He has a pending case. |
0:34.7 | So it is regarding the phones taken in his pending case. |
0:38.3 | His phones, text messages between him and Karen Reed. |
0:41.6 | The Commonwealth is saying that they want to use any text messages between the two that relate |
0:48.5 | to a supposed or alleged witness intimidation to show consciousness of guilt. |
0:57.1 | Not to prosecute. We know that a grand jury was impaneled and did not indict on that, but to show, look, if she's trying to get witnesses |
1:02.7 | to not come to court or to not say this or that, if that even exists, then they're trying |
1:08.4 | to get it in to argue she knows that she's guilty and she's doing this because she knows she's guilty. So that's where they're trying to get it in to argue, she knows that she's guilty and she's doing this |
1:12.5 | because she knows she's guilty. So that's where they're trying to get to. So we saw that |
1:18.3 | hearing where you had the Commonwealth arguing to a different judge that they were entitled to all |
1:25.5 | of this, that the other prosecutor has it under that Rule 17. We've also now seen Aiden Carney Turtle Boy asking for a protective |
1:33.2 | order if those are disclosed, which is appropriate if you're disclosing that type of information. |
1:37.7 | It would be literally for the prosecutor for the defense on the other side, and that's it. |
1:42.6 | That's not stuff that should be in motions. |
1:44.8 | And I don't think it's much of a stretch to ask for because we've seen protective orders |
1:48.4 | for Proctor's text messages and such. I don't see an issue having a protective order for Turtle |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.