This is Jay Seculo, the judges demanding answers about grand juries in Trump's document case.

Keeping you informed and engaged, now more than ever, this is Seculo.

We want to hear from you, share and post your comments for call 1-800-684-3-110.

And now your host, Jay Seculo.

Hey everybody, welcome to the broadcast.

We've got lots of talk about new whistleblower case that we're going to get into.

We talked a little bit about that on Friday.

But there's also been a development in the Trump document case down in Mar-a-Lago.

And that is Judge Cannon has demanded an explanation of, quote, I'm reading from the order here,

the legal propriety of using an out-of-district grand jury proceeding to continue to investigate the documents case.

And also, she struck two of the prosecutor's sealed filings.

Now, the interesting aspect of this is there's apparently the grand jury's continuing to investigate.

The problem is you've got a grand jury from another jurisdiction doing the investigation,

which does raise a proprietary question, meaning is that even legal to do?

I think it's highly questionable that this could be an approach that could be utilized here, Jordan.

Yeah, I think when you honestly look at this, again, it seems like a classic jacksmith, a move,

is that we're going to file these charges, but we'll go to a different grand jury in a different location.

And we'll put this grand jury forward and we're going to put new charges there.

Remember, in the case in Florida, they've already added additional charges here.

So they're looking at those additional charges.

And the question is, are there more to come?

And then you kind of apply that to what happened into Washington, D.C.

...