3 • 791 Ratings
🗓️ 2 April 2025
⏱️ 14 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This is a true crime, new crime report. The latest on new cases we're following at true crime today |
0:06.3 | and the Hidden Killers podcast. On March 27th, 2025 in a Tallahassee courtroom, Judge Stephen Everett |
0:14.0 | made a decision with potential ramifications for Donna Adelson's murder trial. He ruled that prosecutors |
0:20.5 | could question Wendy Adelson, |
0:22.6 | the defendant's daughter and ex-wife of the slain law professor Dan Markell, about her novel, |
0:28.5 | This is Our Story, if she contradicts prior statements or the established record while testifying. |
0:35.2 | This ruling, seemingly procedural, carries significant weight. To understand |
0:40.5 | its importance, it's crucial to grasp the context of Donna Adelson's trial. She is not solely |
0:46.2 | accused of murder, but also of being part of a family conspiracy that allegedly began when |
0:51.9 | her daughter felt trapped in Tallahassee due to a post-divorce custody battle. |
0:57.1 | The prosecution's motive theory hinges on Wendy Adelson's desire to relocate to South Florida with her children, |
1:03.4 | a move opposed by Dan Markell, and legally blocked by a judge. |
1:08.4 | Prosecutors contend that this restriction fueled Wendy's family to orchestrate the |
1:13.0 | murder. This is our story, published in 2011, introduces a layer of complexity. The novel features |
1:21.0 | Lily, a lawyer who leaves her D.C. career to follow her academic husband to a university town in |
1:27.1 | North Florida, becomes |
1:28.4 | dissatisfied and eventually excludes him from her life, adopting a child independently. |
1:34.5 | The parallels between Lily's experiences and Wendy's life are striking, particularly in the |
1:40.3 | emotional undercurrents of discontent and resentment. The prosecution views this not as coincidence, |
1:46.2 | but as a potential insight into Wendy's state of mind, |
1:49.4 | and the family dynamics that they believe motivated Donna Adelson. |
1:53.8 | However, the legal admissibility of fiction as evidence is complex. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.