Redempt, rehabilitated, and real entertaining.

This is the Carl Jackson podcast.

Hello and welcome to Tuesday's edition of the Carl Jackson Show podcast.

This is your daily dose of objective truth in a world of confusion and lies.

Guys, I am so looking forward to this interview with my guest today.

And I think you're going to, well, it's weird because I want to say,

I think you're going to like what you have to hear, but I'm not so sure that that's true.

At least you're going to walk away informed and hopefully with a better understanding of who this guy George Sorrow says and a way to combat the narrative that if you go after George Sorrow said his evil ideas, you're somehow anti-Semitic.

So anyway, Josh Hammer, welcome to the Carl Jackson Show podcast.

Hey, thanks so much for having me. I appreciate it.

Absolutely. Josh, I got a, you're an attorney as well, right?

Yes, okay. So I got to ask you would be remiss to ask you the whole situation with Trump.

I just want to get your take on it. I'm a Trump guy. I love Trump. I also love the Santas, frankly.

But, but I just want to get your take on what's happening with him.

Sure. So look, I mean, you cannot necessarily divorce the current prosecution from the broader context.

I mean, people say that they've been trying to get Trump since it came down the escalator in June 2015 because they've been trying to get Trump since it came down the escalator in June 2015 going back to Michael Flynn and Pfizer surveillance, the Russia collusion delusion, you know, two impeachment's one for a five to six page transcript of a phone call of Linus Lensky, the other for something that he wasn't

going to be able to get the phone call of Linus Lensky. So I think that's a great thing to do.

You know, you're responsible for a really January say so the whole thing is a is a slave from that perspective and, you know, on the merits of this particular case, this prosecution should not have been brought now.

So at a bare minimum, they got the documents that they needed to get presumably when they rated Mar-a-Lago last August.

You know, the feds were in there at 6 a.m. It was a pre-don rate. So whatever documents they felt they needed to acquire, they presumably got so at a bare minimum, even if you're going to prosecute, the timing is very, very suspicious.

They could have easily announced they were still investigating and they could have put off, they could have announced they were putting off any decision to prosecute until after the election next fall until after November 24.

That's probably what they should have done, especially considering that the DOJ and the FBI have a whole protocol, a manual of trying to avoid the perception of political bias.

...