All right, we are live. Hi, this is William Ramsey. Welcome to William Ramsey Investigates on today's show. I have a very special guest, returning guest. We just talked recently about the film, Enemy of the State. His name is Tom Sucker, and he co-wrote the book with another of my guests, Matthew Alford. The book was National Security Cinema, shocking new evidence of government control in Hollywood.

And you can go back and listen to those two interviews that I had.

But today he reached out to me and he did some excellent research.

Actually, a Freedom of Information Act request that he had about the Epstein case.

Really still important.

If anybody forgets, he died, Epstein died on August 10th, 2019.

But Tom did some great work with his group. They called their work all the detail. He can talk

more about that and about his research into the case. So Tom Sucker, welcome back to the show.

Thanks for creating today. Hey, William. Thanks for having me. Awesome. So Tom Sucker, welcome back to the show. Thanks for creating the interview.

Hey, William. Thanks for having me. Awesome. So for people who may not have heard our last show,

you run the Klandestine podcast, the Spy Culture website, but you are working with the team doing some research. And can you talk about how that started and what the Freedom of Information Act turned up?

Sure, sure.

So this is a small team that I was running at RT, though we've now left for what should probably be fairly obvious reasons.

Although we're still somewhat working together and looking towards trying to launch the detail as a kind of independent outlet on its own if we can.

But essentially this was a follow-up on a story that the New York Times did sometime last, I think it was late last summer,

where they said they'd got hold of a bunch of files from the Bureau of Prisons on Epstein's

brief stay at the MCC, the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York.

He was only there for about five weeks from early July until, as you said, his death on August 10th, 2019.

And the New York Times piece obviously went out of its way to try and uphold and underpin

the suicide narrative, which hardly anyone actually believes, let's face it.

And their story we felt was pretty weak.

There was a follow-up, I think, a few days later by Vice,

...