meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Legal AF by MeidasTouch

Jack Smith SHOCKS Trump with BRILLIANT Maneuver

Legal AF by MeidasTouch

Meidas Media Network

News Commentary, News

4.96.1K Ratings

🗓️ 27 August 2024

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Corporate media has it wrong: in the Trump DC election interference criminal case, the Special Counsel Jack Smith will NOT need to use a “mini trial” to defend his indictment against dismissal, and that’s NOT A WIN FOR TRUMP. Michael Popok who practices federal criminal law explains how Smith made his indictment MAGA Supreme Court-proof, and would never want to turn his trial playbook over to Trump before the real trial. Head to https://manukora.com/legalaf to receive $25 off your starter kit today! Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Join the Legal AF Patreon: https://Patreon.com/LegalAF Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Michael Popoc, Legal A.F. Some people were worried, but not me that Jack Smith was going to have a hard time defending his indictment in the DC election interference case against the new immunity decision issued by the United States Supreme Court, the MAGA right wing of that court on July 1.

0:17.3

Everybody was dithering and wringing their hands.

0:20.0

Oh no, will the indictment survive? Will he be able to prosecute Donald Trump in the DC election

0:26.4

interference case? What will be the procedures? Don't worry. I already see corporate media

0:31.3

reporting this the wrong way. They're reporting it like

0:34.0

Jack Smith rejects opportunity to put on mini trial against Donald Trump.

0:40.0

That is written by people who don't practice law.

0:43.0

I hate to be rude, but let's just call it out for what it is on legal A.F.

0:47.0

For those that practice regularly in federal court, including criminal law,

0:51.0

let me tell you why the mini trial thing never was a thing. I mean it was

0:58.0

delicious. It was something I would have loved to have seen Mike Pence and all of the coup plotters be dragged in including from

1:06.0

their locations in prisons to testify against Donald Trump but that's not how you

1:11.2

test the veracity of an indictment. An indictment is issued by a grand jury.

1:16.0

The indictment has to rise or fall on its own merits, on its own four quarters of what is on the face of the indictment. A prosecutor is not allowed to

1:25.6

supplement the indictment, change the indictment. The indictment is the charging document.

1:31.4

It is issued from a grand jury. It informs the criminal defendant in our system

1:36.8

of justice who is presumed to be innocent about the charges against them and the evidence

1:42.2

against them.

1:43.0

Separately, the prosecutor has to provide an entire truckload, electronic or otherwise, of all of the documents, information, witness testimony, data that would both be incriminating

1:57.6

and exculpating, meaning tending to prove someone's innocence.

2:02.0

That is an obligation of the prosecutors in our

2:03.8

system of government and it has to be turned over in advance. And so that's

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Meidas Media Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Meidas Media Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.