It Wasn't Proctor?! Judge Rules on Prosecution Report and Recalling Witnesses? | Case Brief

The Emily Show

Baker Media, LLC.

Entertainment News, True Crime, News

4.9 • 2.1K Ratings

🗓️ 17 May 2025

⏱️ 27 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/P_Lo2vXvHyM Day 17 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 16, 2025. The court addressed juror conduct issues, with a jurors making facial expressions and muttering. A stipulation was read regarding State Police troopers present at the autopsy, specifically noting Troopers Keefe and Watson were present, not Former Trooper Michael Proctor. Andre Porto, the Forensic Scientist, testimony revolved around DNA evidence found on a piece of glass and the tail light, with John O'Keefe's DNA and DNA from two unknown individuals being present. The defense strategy focused on questioning the thoroughness of the investigation and emphasizing that unknown DNA samples were not tested against other individuals of interest like Brian Higgins. Legal arguments arose regarding the chain of custody of evidence and delays in its submission. The judge ruled on objections and addressed issues related to rebuttal witnesses and ARCA expert testimony. There were discussions about new information and reports from experts causing potential time shifts and debates over whether this information was truly new or if it was previously disclosed. The day ended with testimony from Ash Vallier, a Forensic Scientist who pieced together the tail light, with discussions about which pieces fit and which did not. Some items from evidence bags were not fitting together mechanically and other items from different bags were fitting together. Defense Attorney, David Yannetti, crossed Vallier, highlighting potential issues with the chain of custody and who had access to evidence, particularly with Trooper Proctor. Trooper Michael Proctor was identified as submitting clothing evidence to the lab six weeks after the incident and the person who brought in the all of the pieces in the dash 7 series that fit together. Judge Cannone addressed concerns about new expert reports from Aperture, ruling that they were not grounds for undue surprise or prejudice but were ample ground for cross-examination by the defense. The Judge also addressed the ARCCA expert issue, allowing limited rebuttal testimony of Aperture only as to the new opinions by ARCCA from their May 7th report. The Judge stated the defense could recall witnesses under certain circumstances and addressed the long weekend break, stating it would give the defense the time they had requested. RESOURCES Calling a Witness Back? https://youtu.be/Wzt0SgXLa7k&t=564s Former Trooper Proctor Did Not Attend The Autopsy - https://youtu.be/etzXdZ2T3D4&t=128s What You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTS This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Welcome back. It's time for a case brief, keeping you in the loop with the cases you care about most, just more briefly.
0:05.2	If you want the full coverage, it's linked in the description below. But for now, let's get into it.
0:10.6	It is day 17 of the retrial of Karen Reid. We are still in the Commonwealth's case in chief.
0:18.4	Yesterday, we heard from the coroner, which I'm sure is testimony
0:21.8	that the jurors were waiting for.
0:24.6	I expect we're going to get into the rest of that scientific testimony.
0:28.1	We know the Commonwealth has two new medical experts.
0:30.4	And then we have all the other scientific evidence, which I imagine is what they're going
0:33.6	to wade through on a Friday because, well well we've got to go through DNA testing blood
0:38.9	testing the manual fitting together of all the pieces of the taillight and all the rest of it
0:44.2	and if I'm the prosecutor that's what I'm going to do on a Friday because the jurors are probably
0:49.3	tired it's been a lot this week and that's evidence that you need like three sentences of that testimony,
0:56.0	but it's so much foundation that has to be laid before you get to like what is the result
1:02.0	that it just can feel like a bit of a slog in court. So I imagine that's what they're going to do
1:07.0	on Friday and then start with their medical experts maybe on Monday because the jury
1:11.4	will be more fresh then.
1:13.1	It's so important that each and every juror can hear the evidence or the testimony
1:20.6	that's presented, can follow the testimony, and can understand and evaluate the testimony of the witness and the exhibits.
1:29.3	In order to do that, I just want to be very clear that it's important that people do not
1:35.3	comment on the evidence or make any comments.
1:39.3	Once you enter the room, it's probably a good idea to just think, just listen. Oh boy. Don't make any facial
1:46.9	expressions. No muttering under your breath. No audible. Oh dear. Because people need to hear what's going on
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.