It Ends In Court. Diddy’s New Indictment. Sarah Boone Appeal Issues?

The Emily Show

Baker Media, LLC.

Entertainment News, True Crime, News

4.9 • 2.1K Ratings

🗓️ 4 February 2025

⏱️ 68 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The “It Ends With Us” lawsuits have a court date of March 9th, 2026. The attorneys faced off in Court on February 3rd, 2025, arguing who started the smear campaign and the judge promptly told them to knock it off. The Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni Federal lawsuits against each other have been consolidated and many issues were addressed. The Joneswork PR vs Baldoni lawsuit was filed on January 27th, 2025, and is a related lawsuit to the consolidated cases. The NY Times hasn’t been served yet and Lively’s attorneys argued that the case may need to be unconsolidated after just being recently consolidated due to The NY Times being a defendant. Lively intends to file a Protective Order on Discovery which is normal for high profile cases. Diddy received a Superseding Indictment which added additional victims to the racketeering conspiracy charges. Shortly after Karen Read’s Hearing on January 31st, 2025, Judge Cannone made a ruling not to do a Daubert Hearing on the defense digital forensics expert, Mr. Green. She had also narrowed a prior ruling regarding journalist Gretchen Voss’ notes allowing most of it to remain private. Sarah Boone wrote a letter to the courts because she said that a Notice to Appeal was not filed on her case. The Court wrote back to her informing who her Appellate Attorney is. According to the Sarah Boone’s Online Docket, it says that the Notice of Appeal was filed on December 18th, 2024 but received by the Clerk on January 31st, 2025. It seems like a clerical error and it should not affect the progress of her case. RESOURCES Baldoni Wayfarer Parties Website – https://thelawsuitinfo.com Lively Federal Lawsuit Complaint – https://emilydbaker.com/LivelyFederalComplaint This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Welcome back to The Emily Show, Monday edition, probably on a Tuesday this week, because I recorded this episode very late because the lawyers are out of control this week. And we have so much to talk about. Is today going to be a deep dive into all of it? No. Do we have time for it to be a deep dive into all of it? No. But are we going to get into it? Oh, yes, we are. Why? Well,
0:23.0	did he caught a superseding indictment that I'm sure his lawyers are going to be thrilled about?
0:28.7	We have some updates in the Karen Reed case ahead of another hearing in court coming up on Thursday,
0:34.9	February 6th. We have a hearing coming up probably before this episode
0:39.0	airs, but after it records, because podcasting on Monday, February 3rd. And, well, Sarah Boone
0:47.7	had some questions for the court that y'all have asked me about. We need to talk about that
0:51.4	too. So for all of you who are new to the Emily Show podcast, if you're watching on YouTube, there are timestamps down below to get to the stories you care about. We need to talk about that too. So for all of you who are new to the Emily Show podcast,
0:55.0	if you're watching on YouTube, there are timestamps down below to get to the stories you care about
0:58.5	most and never miss an episode with the Lawnerdard app at Lawnardap.com. Let's get into it.
1:03.3	Hey there, before we get all the way into it, I wanted to make a note that there is an addendum.
1:07.2	We pushed back this episode, knowing that this hearing is something you want to know about.
1:11.5	So we're just adding an addendum here. So if you hear me say, well, they're going to court.
1:16.1	I've got you covered at the end of this episode. Let's get into the rest of what I recorded a few days ago.
1:21.8	Welcome to the Emily Show. I'm Emily D. Baker, the internet's go-to legal analyst, and big fan of the cursy words.
1:28.2	I've been a licensed attorney for over 17 years. I'm a former prosecutor, and I break down the
1:33.2	legal side of pop culture and entertainment stories we can't stop talking about. We should just
1:38.3	get into it. Let's get started with some quick updates.
1:50.3	And for those of you that have watched the QuickBits episodes or listen to them on your favorite podcasting app about the Karen Reed case, I talked about the hearing that was in court in Massachusetts on Friday, January 31st.
2:02.5	And surprise of all surprises, though this judge does not rule from the bench, the court did
2:09.1	rule late in the day on Friday the 31st. I know. I know. I was surprised as well. But let's talk about what those rulings were real quick.
2:21.9	And the episode where I summarize that hearing will be down below. But it was a hearing to have a
2:28.1	hearing. And there are a lot of things still pending as this case speeds towards jury selection
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Baker Media, LLC., and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Baker Media, LLC. and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.