4.4 • 717 Ratings
🗓️ 9 December 2015
⏱️ 11 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
A couple weeks ago, I linked to an article discussing the “obesity paradox”—the idea that across many different studies and populations, people with slightly overweight and even obese BMIs often have the lowest mortality risk. The author is Harriet Brown, a supporter of the “Health At Every Size” movement, comes down hard on the side of overweight/obesity as safe and even beneficial. At first glance, she makes a strong case. She appears to cite compelling research. She talks to obesity researchers who’ve found protective links between higher BMIs and better health and been lambasted by their colleagues. And if the general consensus is right, and carrying extra weight is so unhealthy, why are obesity and overweight consistently associated with a lower risk of death?
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The following Mark's Daily Apple article was written by Mark Sisson, and is narrated by Tina Lehman. |
| 0:17.0 | Is there really an obesity paradox? |
| 0:20.0 | A couple weeks ago, I linked to an article on Marksdailyapple.com discussing the obesity paradox, |
| 0:27.6 | the idea that across many different studies and populations, people with slightly overweight and even obese BMIs, have the lowest mortality risk. The author is Harriet Brown, |
| 0:41.0 | a supporter of the health at every size movement, who comes down hard on the side of overweight and |
| 0:47.4 | obesity as safe and even beneficial. At first glance, she makes a strong case. She appears to cite compelling research. She talks to |
| 0:57.8 | obesity researchers who have found protective links between higher BMI's and better health, and |
| 1:03.5 | bin Laden-based by their colleagues. And if the general consensus is right, and carrying extra |
| 1:09.4 | weight is so unhealthy, why are obesity and overweight |
| 1:13.3 | consistently associated with a lower risk of death? Brown claims that no other researchers |
| 1:19.7 | have been able to make the paradox go away. She highlights and dismisses two possible explanations |
| 1:26.1 | for the paradox. First, that heavier people visit |
| 1:29.7 | the doctor more often and receive more and better medical treatment than normal weight people. |
| 1:35.2 | Although Brown calls this the most popular of the explanations before proceeding to rightly demolish it, |
| 1:41.8 | I haven't heard many obesity researchers give it serious thought. |
| 1:45.9 | The second explanation is the unhealthy weight loss one. If people who are normal weight because |
| 1:52.1 | they lost weight due to cancer, smoking, sarcopenia, or another wasting condition, are lumped in |
| 1:58.5 | with people who are normal weight because they're lean, fit, and healthy, |
| 2:02.4 | the correlation between normal BMI and mortality is skewed. After admitting there's some evidence |
| 2:09.0 | to back up this argument, Brown pivots to the opinion of a single researcher who says, |
| 2:14.6 | it certainly does not seem to make the paradox go away. Okay, how comprehensive |
| 2:20.9 | was Brown's coverage of the explanations for the paradox? Did she leave anything out? As it turns out, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Sisson & Morgan Zanotti, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Sisson & Morgan Zanotti and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.