meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Marketplace Morning Report

Is there a cost if economists face pressure to back up Trump?

Marketplace Morning Report

American Public Media

News, Business

4.5808 Ratings

🗓️ 13 August 2025

⏱️ 7 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Recently, President Donald Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after revisions depicted a weaker job market than initially thought. This week, Trump called on the CEO of Goldman Sachs to get rid of his chief economist, after the economist predicted that tariffs would force consumers to pay extra. What should consumers and investors make of this? We'll discuss. And later, we'll hear how French factories are benefiting from increased defense spending.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Is there a cost if economists face pressure to back up President Trump?

0:06.3

I'm David Brancaccio in Los Angeles. If you don't like the economic message, change the messenger.

0:12.3

The other day it was President Trump firing. The head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, after revisions, depicted a weaker job market than first thought.

0:20.7

Then this week, President Trump called on the CEO of Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs to get rid of his chief economist,

0:27.4

after the economist predicted not unreasonably that tariffs will force consumers to pay extra.

0:33.2

Working to discourage economic views that don't fit the administration's narrative can add risk for

0:38.2

stock market players. Susan Schmidt is portfolio manager at Exchange Capital Resources.

0:43.7

All of the major banks have economists out there espousing what they think might happen.

0:49.4

There's always an opinion that's different than the administrations, And it's highly unusual. I don't think that

0:56.6

I've ever seen this before in my career where the president has singled out one economist

1:01.3

to say this doesn't fit with my view. I don't agree. So if there's an effort to stifle views

1:07.2

that may be at odds with what the administration wants. I mean, does it have a wider effect?

1:12.7

There's plenty of other views out there. Fisling any views or perhaps changing the way data is

1:18.3

calculated makes it really hard for investors because it disrupts how they're used to processing

1:23.9

information. Importantly, it makes investors have lower confidence in the market

1:30.6

overall. That tends to make investors risk averse. And so it levels out markets, causing investors

1:38.1

to look at them with more skepticism and potentially lower us from these all-time highs that we're seeing right now.

1:45.6

Investors like certainty, comments like that imply that data is changing.

1:50.7

We criticize the Chinese market all the time because we believe that the Chinese government

1:56.3

pulls general data that doesn't agree with the overall government's opinion, and yet this has the

2:02.9

flavor of potentially starting down that same path here in the U.S.

2:07.3

Susan Schmidt, senior portfolio manager at Exchange Capital Resources. Thanks for this.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 11 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from American Public Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of American Public Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.