Is It Time for California to Consider a "Soft Secession"?
KQED's Forum
KQED
4.2 • 727 Ratings
🗓️ 7 October 2025
⏱️ 42 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | If you had the smartest Wi-Fi, it'd be Xfinity. |
| 0:05.1 | It would boost speeds to the devices that needed them most, and to protect you from threats at home and online. |
| 0:11.7 | Xfinity. Imagine that. Restrictions apply. |
| 0:15.3 | Support for KQWED podcasts comes from Landmark College, commemorating 40 years of educating people who learn differently, |
| 0:22.5 | with programs on campus and online for both students and professionals. Learn more at |
| 0:27.8 | landmark.edu. From KQED. Welcome to Forum. I'm Alexis Madrigal. Over the last 20 years, Republican-controlled states and their allies in the judiciary have built a new power infrastructure out of the latent potential of statehood. And now, as the Trump administration breaks norms and often laws in pursuit of a different America, there have been calls in blue states to fight back |
| 0:55.2 | against federal power. But what should the states do and how? It's not just resisting. Blue |
| 1:01.8 | states are also building new alliances to take on some of the tasks that traditionally |
| 1:06.1 | would have been federal responsibilities. In a new essay in Mother Jones, Clara Jeffrey outlined some of the many tactics now at play |
| 1:14.7 | to throw the state's economic might around. |
| 1:18.2 | It's a set of maneuvers that could be tantamount to a, quote, soft secession. |
| 1:23.3 | To talk about what that could mean, we're joined by Claire Jeffrey, editor-in-chief of |
| 1:26.4 | Mother Jones and the Center for Investigative Reporting. |
| 1:28.9 | Welcome, Clara. |
| 1:29.9 | Thanks so much for having me, Alexis. |
| 1:31.6 | And we're also joined by John Michaels, Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law and Advisor |
| 1:36.3 | to the Dean on Civic Engagement. |
| 1:38.2 | Welcome, John. |
| 1:39.2 | Thanks for having me. |
| 1:40.4 | So let's just go straight to the name. |
| 1:43.2 | Soft Secession. How do you define that? |
| 1:48.1 | Well, it's defined sort of as not a violent break of like 1861, but another term for it is |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from KQED, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of KQED and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

