This episode is brought to you by Network Rail.

It's easy to disappear into your own bubble when you're out and about,

whether you're lost in your thoughts or lost in nature.

The last thing on your mind is the danger of trains at level crossings.

Beware the bubble, stay aware, take care and help us keep you safe at level crossings.

This is CBS, I Am the World with Malcolm Hone Line Conference of President's Major American Jewish Organizations.

I'm John Bachelors. We welcome David Albright, founder and president of the Institute for Science and International Security to help us understand what was learned and what was left out of the most recent meeting of the IAEA.

Concerning Islamic Republic of Iran's Suspect Nuclear Weapons Program. David, a very good evening to you. Malcolm, you have a question.

Yes, first of all, David, thank you for doing this and it's certainly extremely timely given the events of the last few days.

So how would you characterize what happened? Some say it was a sellout, some say it wasn't that it was only a partial closing down of the cases involving the suspected attempts to weaponize its nuclear program.

How do you evaluate it?

My analysis is based on reading the IAEA reports, these corner of the reports and there's two of them.

One is on, what's called the safeguards, which gets to this whole question of, is Iran telling the truth about past and possibly ongoing nuclear weapons program and it focuses on, on declared nuclear material.

And at various sites that have been identified by the IAEA. And if you read that report, it's a very negative report.

It's in real contradictions of much of the media reporting that came out last week.

The IAEA is out very clearly that that Iran is not providing answers.

It's a stonewalling, it'll go after things, if Iran feels it can defeat the IAEA, it'll try to do that.

And an example would be what's called the Maravans site, which was one of four nuclear weapons development sites during this early 2000 nuclear weapons program and was decided to do the largest experiments of nuclear weapons components, including a kind of a mockup of a whole nuclear explosive device.

The IAEA has been presenting the information saying, well, Iran, we've got your cold, let's talk about it, and every time Iran says no.

Now, when the IAEA finally was allowed to go there a couple of years ago, after overcoming Iranian resistance, they took an environmental sample that detected some uranium.

Iran has come up with a possible, and that's the IAEA puts at a possible answer for that uranium being from an old lab associated with the uranium mine in the 1960s.

But by no means to the IAEA close the file, and in the report it makes clear we stand by our results on our Maravans and an IAEA speak is never easy to understand.

...