meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The New Yorker Radio Hour

Investigating January 6th

The New Yorker Radio Hour

WNYC Studios and The New Yorker

News, David, Books, Arts, Storytelling, Wnyc, New, Remnick, News Commentary, Yorker, Politics

4.25.5K Ratings

🗓️ 1 April 2022

⏱️ 29 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

With a judge declaring that Donald Trump “more likely than not” committed a felony in his attempt to overturn the Presidential election, the congressional committee investigating January 6th is racing to finish its work before the looming midterm elections. Amy Davidson Sorkin and the legal scholar Jeannie Suk Gersen talk with David Remnick about the law and the politics of holding Trump accountable. And the music writer Sheldon Pearce shares three artists that didn’t get their due in the Grammy nominations.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and the New Yorker.

0:09.8

Welcome to the New Yorker Radio Hour, I'm David Remnick.

0:13.8

We're entering a critical stage of our investigation.

0:17.8

We've now taken the testimony of hundreds of witnesses with knowledge of the events

0:22.4

of January 6th, including more than a dozen former Trump White House staff.

0:28.0

The House Select Committee investigating the insurrection has been on the case for

0:32.6

the better part of a year.

0:34.6

And just in the last week, we've learned that the White House call log show a mysterious

0:39.3

gap of seven hours on January 6th.

0:43.4

And a federal judge issued a major ruling in a case related to the committee's work in

0:47.9

which he stated that President Trump likely committed a felony in attempting to obstruct

0:53.0

Congress.

0:54.5

The Select Committee itself has produced some stunning revelations already, but time

0:59.1

is working against it.

1:01.1

If the Republican Party gains control of the House in this year's midterm elections

1:04.6

as they're predicted to do, they're almost sure to dismantle the effort and take any

1:10.0

idea of accountability off the table.

1:13.3

To get a sense of what all this means, I called on two colleagues, Amy Davidson Sorkin,

1:18.0

who writes regularly about politics and Jeannie Suk-Gerson, who covers legal issues, and

1:23.1

is a professor of law at Harvard.

1:26.4

Jeannie, how would you describe the stakes of what the committee is trying to learn here?

1:30.4

And who's listening?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.