A heavy-handed nanny state approach, much like the European Union, would cripple America's leadership in AI.

GOP lawmakers are divided on how to regulate artificial intelligence.

From WNYC in New York, this is on the media. I'm Brooke Gladstone.

And I'm Michael Owinger.

The question is, will China's deep seek, oh so cheap and transparent,

pop America's AI bubble? It's always been this idea that America has built these big,

beautiful, large language models that require all of this money based on their narrative.

There's not actually been much behind them. Also on this week's show, an AI music generator gives a composer a run for his money.

I don't want to admit it, but it's good.

Like, really good.

It feels real.

It's all coming up after this.

From WNYC in New York, this is on the media.

I'm Michael Lowinger.

And I'm Brooke Gladstone.

I'm not breaking any news here when I say that artificial intelligence has found its way into almost every aspect of our lives.

A recent survey found that 86% of students use AI and more and more people are using it in their office jobs.

People are falling hopelessly in love with AI powered chatbots or falling down AI-generated conspiratorial rabbit holes.

And when it comes to jobs, whether you create content, assemble cars, or even drive them for a living,

you're probably scared, especially if you're young and have the most time ahead of you. One recent study found that 52% of people aged 18 to 24 have job worries related to AI.

Before the Senate removed it all together,

there was even a provision about AI regulation in the big, beautiful bill,

...