meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

In Search of Monsters to Destroy: The Folly of American Empire and the Paths to Peace

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Government, Policy, 424708, Immigration, Defense, Peace, Politics, News, Cato, Libertarian, News Commentary, Markets

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 21 December 2022

⏱️ 21 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Wishing the United States were less of a global hegemon doesn't mean giving up on engagement with the globe, as Christopher Coyne argues in his new book, In Search of Monsters to Destroy: The Folly of American Empire and the Paths to Peace.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Kato Daily Podcast for Wednesday, December 21st, 2022.

0:08.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:09.0

The choice for American foreign policy shouldn't be framed as simply imperialism versus disengagement.

0:14.8

Christopher Coyne in his new book In Search of Monsters to Destroy discusses what he views

0:19.6

as workable, serious ways to engage with the world that don't involve expanding or maintaining an American

0:26.1

empire.

0:27.1

We spoke earlier this month.

0:28.7

When we talk about economics broadly, we talk about like what rules govern the relations that we might engage in as

0:37.5

human beings and sort of come to the conclusion that a good rule is one that allows for a lot of transactions.

0:44.7

When it comes to animosities between countries, you want the opposite of that.

0:52.4

And our rules in in many cases, are meant to prevent or at least give us due consideration,

0:58.9

give us time for due consideration before making a potentially disastrous decision on behalf of a government.

1:08.3

So I guess how do you view the incentives and the rules that we that governments around the world accept when it comes to

1:19.5

animosities that might bubble up. Yeah, well that's a big question, one that has troubled scholars for centuries.

1:28.0

And so on the one hand you can see the argument that as you put it quite nicely when there's

1:33.8

animosities you need rules for engaging that but also who is going to engage

1:38.8

it and and in the world we live in now people typically view nation states as having a

1:44.8

critical role and really a few nation states in the in the post you know cold

1:50.2

war period the United States and so what's known kind of is the

1:53.5

unipolar moment where the US government was the dominant government of the world

1:57.4

and you know they make an argument a lot of people make an argument that the US

2:01.6

government has a global and international role to both establish rules and enforce those rules.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.