What did the Supreme Court's recent decision on affirmative action actually change?

And what does it mean for who gets into elite colleges?

I'm Preet Bharara, and this week, Yale Law Professor Justin Driver joins me on Stay Tuned with Preet

to trace the history of affirmative action and explain where we are in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in SFFA versus Harvard.

The episode is out now. Search and follow. Stay tuned with Preet, wherever you get your podcasts.

If you've ever heard the line, every billionaire is a policy failure. It might hit your ear as

just another empty or vague catchphrase,

or even worse, a useless hashtag. But is it actually vague? And more importantly, is it actually

useless? Beneath the sentiment is a serious policy question.

Is the existence of billionaires a sign that we've engineered unsustainable levels of inequality?

The word unsustainable is key there, because if we set aside for the moment moral questions about

what's right and wrong and just ask if this kind of inequality represents an existential threat

to democratic societies, it's not clear what the answer is, or at least it's not simple.

But I do think there's more than enough reasons to suppose that what we're or at least it's not simple.

But I do think there's more than enough reasons to suppose that what we're doing now isn't

sustainable.

And if that's true, what should we do about it?

I'm Sean Elling, and this is the gray area.

Today's guest is Ingrid Robbins.

She's a political philosopher and economist at Utrecht University in the Netherlands. And she's just written a new book called Limitarianism, the case against extreme wealth.

The basic argument is that we should impose limits on how much wealth and resources an individual can accumulate.

And not just because it is the right thing to do,

...