Is there a problem with universal male invalidating?

Sounds simple enough.

You fill out a ballot, stick it in the mail,

somebody counts it on election day.

In fact, we already do that with absentee ballots, right?

So why would universal male invalidating be any different?

Well, the biggest difference is that with absentee ballots,

the voter specifically asks for a ballot.

With universal male invalidating,

ballots are mailed out and mass.

Millions of people who would normally go to the polls

vote by mail instead.

No national election has ever been conducted this way.

And there are very good reasons to be concerned

that one ever should.

Reason number one, bureaucratic incompetence.

I don't think I have to sell you on the idea

that when the government bureaucracy takes on a big new project

with little preparation, the results aren't pretty.

We've seen those results as it relates

to mail-in-balloting already.

Wisconsin was one of the first states

...